On 13 Mar 2005 22:39:00 +0100 Rainer Zocholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> But the doc is far from "done" and a simply RTFM is sufficient. > > >I didn't say RTFM. > > At 13 Mar 05, 17:49 > someone abusing [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Kojm) email adress wrote: > "It seems you haven't even looked at the docs." > > That sound to me like a "RTFM". That's a much more polite statement than RTFM, IMHO. > When you meant "read http://www.clamav.net/doc/0.83/html/node28.html";, > and not the man pages, why didn't you simply write it? > > You would saved all readers a lot of time, and it would have costs > you only a few seconds, because you know where to search what, > because you wrote it... Nasty me! > >Sorry but I find your posts _very_ chaotic. > > Sorry but I find the clamav documentation _very_ chaotic. > But: What's worser? ;-) http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/clamav/clamav-devel/docs/clamdoc.tex?rev=1.5&view=log Please send patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Sun Mar 13 23:09:09 CET 2005
pgptKj5kCnX7M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
