John Madden wrote: > I'm running postfix; I won't run qmail.
Well, at least you have some redeeming points :) But, (getting into sermon mode once again), anyone who relies solely on only one point of detection for any type of mail content inspection, are literally bending over and begging for it. Every type of content detector, be it virus, spam or exploits, will at times lag. Fact of life. I do, and admit freely, only run Clam for virus detection these days, but I know there will be rare occasions that it misses something. However, most of this crap will fall prey to many other types of content inspection. Design a proper scanning|detection system, do not wholly rely on the individual components. And with regards to the update times, I previously ran several virii :) scanners on this system, and not one of them compared to Clam for detection rates or definition update speed over a prolonged period of time. Matt _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
