>Randal, Phil: > >Hold on a minute there! ClamAV detects it because it matches an >existing ClamAV virus pattern - that is serendipitous rather than >malicious.
My apoligies if that is the case. However, I do know that Trend detected this before the new definitions were released as well. However, they were unable to effectively stop it since this is a new variant. This is a medium alert for many vendors (see http://secunia.com/virus_information/14877/bagle.bj/) so my guess is that some are caught and some are not. There are a few variants out there. _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
