Hi!
16-Янв-2005 16:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Mathews) wrote to
ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>:
AM> The same ones you've been given already. To repost them is pointless.
AM> Read the archives.
AM> | Let me remind my last questions: which archives and exepackers ClamAV
AM> | recognize? Which algorithms of virus searching there implemented? Do you
AM> | wish to say, that recognizing/algorithms depend from host or that Clamwin
AM> | doesn't shares code with ClamAV (and ClamAV is too dumb to scan inside
AM> | archives or do something more smart, than searching of substrings)?
AM> Do you compile programs under gcc, write perl code, install rpms, unpack
AM> tarballs, dump and restore files, rsync backups, check in and out cvs
AM> code under UNIX and have some wild expectation that Windows will work
AM> the same way? There's a big difference between cross platform virus
AM> definitions and cross platform programs. They're not the same thing.
AM> (and it has nothing to do with clamav's intelligence, but more so
AM> Windows' lack of it) You're comparing apples to arseholes.
Do you wish to say, that, for example, OpenOffice edits texts and
stores own dicuments under Windows differently, than under Linux? Or you
wish to say, that OOo is simpler, than ClamAV?
Even IF ClamAV under finds is dumber/smarter, than under *ix, you may
show me two lists - lists of formats of archives and exepackers under
Windows and under *ix. I wish _this_ answer (or link to such information),
not the essays "how hard to support multiplatform code" or useless "read the
documentation" words. And don't send me to archives (which I don't know
where to find and can't surf without online) - especially because there was
no given to me requested info.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
