Peter Bonivart wrote:
Grow up. I gave pertinent, and truthful, advice to the question, that is all.
To quote your earlier post:
"There's plenty of happy Postfix users running MailScanner, the Postfix author doesn't like the way MailScanner interacts with its queues and Postfix users who do not use MailScanner are quick to judge. Anyway, if you don't have a very good reason for using Postfix, stay with Sendmail since it's faster than Postfix with MailScanner. It has to do with Postfix using only one queue file per message and MailScanner having to rewrite the whole file. "
1. The author of postfix has described in detail, how the manner in which mailscanner manipulates the queue can result in loss of mail. Yes there are postfix users who like mailscanner and will continue to like it...until the first time they lose meail.
2. Reason to use postfix over sendmail? Compare vulnerability histories.
Pertinent information? Maybe, but biased and completely overlooking security and technical issues.
You gave a short warning that is proven wrong by many happy users, if you call that all the fancy things above it's your choice. You have a very short fuse Matt.
Matt is very "laid back" compared to me. -- Robin Lynn Frank - Director of Operations - Paradigm-Omega, LLC Website: http://www.paradigm-omega.com/ RSS: http://paradigm-omega.blogspot.com/atom.xml Spamtraps: http://paradigm-omega.net/cgi-bin/custmail.cgi ===================================================================== In a perfect world there would be no random taglines.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
