My preference has been stated. I would prefer SpamAssassin do the puzzle solving of message bodies, headers, URI lookups, message obfuscation, etc and let ClamAV do the signature matching of attachments.
SA uses many more resources than ClamAV. Clam is going to scan the msg anyway. The more dangerous email I can reject before it gets to SA, the better, IMO.
Also, as I mentioned, we reject malware and filter spam. I don't even want these phishing messages in our users' junkmail folders.
-- Dennis Skinner Systems Administrator BlueFrog Internet http://www.bluefrog.com
"Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. - David Letterman"
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
