Trog wrote: > > You're trying to kid me, right? I'm not going to be scared away just > > because you wish to take a fundamentalist position that ClamAV should > > _not_ offer an option to ignore social engineering attacks even though > > they are clearly different from technical attacks. > > I'm not trying to "scare you away", I really don't care what you do. > > I've told you how you can easily do what you want, using ClamAV.
As Trog has already mentioned, you can simply remove the phishing signatures from the database. This is not trying to scare you away. It is a simple workaround to your specific needs at this moment. Or, as Tomasz and I have both mentioned, you can easily bypass this in your filtering software. This discussion is not a vendetta against the idea, but everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so it is of no use getting touchy when someone offers alternative advice, or a personal opinion. Matt _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
