> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Howell > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 3:44 PM > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> Tim Howell wrote: > >>> Have any of you thought of what it would take to use Clam to scan > >>> mailboxes stored on an Exchange server? > >> > >> Hmmm... > >> Get a list of mailboxes via LDAP > >> Connect to each mailbox in turn using Mail::IMAPClient Walk through > >> all folders in the mailbox Download each mail item to a temporary > >> file Scan the file Accumulate an infection report > > > > (next time I read all my mail before responding top-down ;) > > > > Tim has a good point and for an exchange-specific application this > > would probably be more efficient than a popwatch-type implementation. > > The IMAP idea was actually Matthew's, but I'm working on an > implementation now. I don't know if it will prove useful or not, but a > couple of quick experiments with my own mailbox make me think that it > just might work. =) >
Doesn't that idea forces you to have everyone's password to connect via the IMAP server? -SamSam _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
