Brent Clark wrote: > Only 6 > Which I suppose aint to bad, but still. > But your right, because 5 were (more an Exim issue):
There are five that I know of which should definitely be picked up by virus scanning, so that's about right. The rest are down to scanning, by some other means, for attachments and exploitable message composition. Matt _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
