On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:56:52 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 08:05, Brian Morrison wrote: > > > > *Clamd successfully notified about the update.* > > > > Yes, I get that too. > > > > However, clamd does not immediately report that it has reloaded the > > database, that happens the next time the Database check happens. Is > > that what you see? If so, then I suppose it is correct. > > Clamd won't immediately reload the database. It notes the request the > reload the database, and only does the reload when a request comes in > to actually do some work. So, on a lightly loaded server, there will > be a time difference. Ah, that is the crucial piece of information I was missing. I'm not much of a code wizard and a brief look at the freshclam tree in the source didn't really help. Clearly I should have looked in the clamd part of the tree to find it. Thanks for that, now I feel happier, it never occurred to me to compare the exim logs with the clam logs and correlate activity like that. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
