> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag 
> von Steven Stern
> Bereitgestellt: Mittwoch, 02. Juni 2004 18:54
> Bereitgestellt in: Clamav
> Unterhaltung: [Clamav-users] Comparison clamav with other 
> anti virus software
> Betreff: Re: [Clamav-users] Comparison clamav with other anti 
> virus software
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:33:30 +0200, "Clamav" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >Hello!
> >We are using clamav and clamav-milter on our mail gateway 
> together with 
> >sendmail and it works perfectly - I'm really happy with it 
> and think it 
> >is a great piece of software. I would be interested in differences 
> >between clamav and commercial available anti virus software for our 
> >configuration (means only for mail scanning). Are there 
> >differences/advantages between clamav and other products? Are there 
> >types of viruses not detected by clamav but by other products?
> >
> >I'm interested in this point because some people think that free 
> >software must have disadvantages compared to commercial available 
> >software.
> >
> 
> 
> Just a couple of points based on having run Symantec 
> AntiVirus on an Exchange
> server:
> 
> 1. Support:  Support from Symantec was non-existent.  It was 
> impossible to get anyone on the phone. Email support was 
> slow.  Support for Clam is excellent. Every problem I've had 
> has been answered quickly and thoroughly on this list.
> 
> 2. Definition updates:  Symantec's Live Update would fetch 
> definitions when they were available, but Live Update is 
> limited to once-a-week or big events. You have to write and 
> schedule batch files to get daily updates.  Clam's team 
> produces updates frequently and the Freshclam tool makes it 
> easy to get updated definitions.
> 
> 3. Cost. I paid something several thousand dollars for the 
> mail server portion of Symantec.  Were I using Clam on a 
> commercial system, I would pay for it, but I'd pay on what I 
> perceived its value to be, not on the "what the traffic will 
> bear" basis used by Symantec.
> --
>    Steve

Thank you for the info. Does one of the developer know about 
performance/implementation differences to other products?
Wolfgang


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to