On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Joe Maimon said:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> >Although the F=, should be passing the messages through
> >unscanned if there is a milter problem.  Not sure why sendmail is doing
> >that.
> > 
> Thats not what the F= is for.....If the milter <->sendmail comm. fails, 
> than F= either tempfail or reject.

Actually, that's exactly what the F= is for:
http://www.sendmail.org/~gshapiro/8.10.Training/milterconfig.html
Flags (F=) 
If no flags specified and filter not available, run as if filter wasn't
configured 

Flag   Description
R      Reject connection if filter unavailable 
T      Temporary fail connection if filter unavailable

HTH,
-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Stephen Gran                  | blithwapping:  Using anything BUT a     |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]             | hammer to hammer a nail into the  wall, |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | such as shoes, lamp bases, doorstops,   |
|                                | etc.   -- "Sniglets", Rich Hall &       |
|                                | Friends                                 |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpJQmJ8ddtkd.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to