If we had two lists then the subscribers to the standard clamav list would see
far fewer (note: not zero, I grant you) postings about milter, because even
if the question gets cross-posted, I would like to think that responders will
reply to the appropriate list and not the inappropriate one. That's what I
meant by the situation being improved. It won't be perfect, but it'll be
better.
I do see your point.
the moment with all the questions going to one list. My opinion is that cross-posting would not be a noticeable problem. (And if you don't like it, there's a simple procmail solution - see below.)
I know how to fix it with procmail :) but if a question has been answered on another list then whoever wants to give an answer might not know that the question has been answered on the other list.. If everyone subscribes to two lists then there's no point splitting :)
As long as ppl aren't flamed for asking a question on the wrong list... have it split up and see what happens..
B.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
