> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niek > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 11:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] submitting samples (name instead?) > > > Jim Maul wrote: > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Henry > >>Harvey > >>Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 10:16 AM > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: [Clamav-users] submitting samples (name instead?) > >> > >> > >>Would it be possible to report what > >>viruses (names) are not being detected by ClamAV, > >>instead of submitting a sample? > >> > >>We have Symantec Corporate Ed AV running on > >>all workstations and it blocks those files > >>from even saving to any pc. I have the logs > >>which says that > >> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<SNIP> > >>ClamAV works perfectly fine with other > >>viruses though, like those "SomeFool" viruses. > >> This is a direct contradiction. > he said: those virusses are caught by norton on workstations, > clamav didn't catch them on the mailserver. Given that the workstations > received them by mail. > > Niek Baakman I understand that. What i dont understand is that he basically said, "Somefool is not getting detected by clamav but clamav works fine with other viruses like somefool". Jim ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
