Hanford, Seth wrote: [...]
> Our search really only needs to be one-way, to keep it in scope. There's > no > need to support searching everyone else's names, only Clam's. Everyone's > talking about NetSky? If you're not receiving SomeFool, then why do you > care? If you are, look up SomeFool. If you're getting files and Clam > doesn't detect them, then submit them. They'll be named, and you'll be > able to search. I couldn't disagree more. Why shouldn't we support reverse lookups? If aliases are submitted just like we submit virus samples now, then what harm would it do to allow the door to swing both ways? And the benefit is obvious: Some windows guy got infected with NetSky? Hmmm... I wonder what Clam calls that? Let's find out... -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
