On Sunday 28 March 2004 3:32 am, Fred Flintstone wrote:
> > > I'm having some trouble compiling clamav on an old Linux 2.0 box
> >
> > what is the purpose in running such an old
> > system (updated last month, for the first time in three years)?
>
> The problem is mainly a lack of time. Over the years I've developed my own
> customised mini-distribution based on 2.0. I simply don't have the time at
> the moment to rebuild the entire distribution from scratch (using 2.4 and
> glibc). Key advantages of the old distribution: (Much) smaller footprint in
> both RAM and HDD, better speed, and better compatibility with old hardware.
Hm, I guess I can understand, however I hope you get round to it sometime this
year :)
> Can you help out with the problem itself?
Personally, I can't, no, since I don't know the internals of ClamAV and what
it may be having a problem with. However you have definitely found the
correct list to ask, since the developers are all here, and if anyone can
answer your question I think this is where they'll be.
Regards,
Antony.
--
"There has always been an underlying argument that we should open up our
source code more broadly. The fact is that we are learning from open source
and we are opening our code more broadly through Shared Source.
Is there value to providing source code? The answer is unequivocally yes."
- Jason Matusow, head of Microsoft's Shared Source Program, in response to
recent leaks of Windows source code on the Internet.
Please reply to the list;
please don't CC me.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
