On Mar 26, 2004, at 11:10 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
Dilip M wrote:
[...]
Only improvement is Test # 12 was detected ?
Where as all other Viruses,ie Test # 19,21,23,25 came through :(
That is exactly what I'm getting with qmail-scanner-1.21 and clamav0.70-rc
(and the CVS version from 2004/03/25).
I think there was a discussion about these last four items a few weeks ago.
Some people complained that ClamAV is not a 'vulnerability/exploit' scanner,
but a virus scanner. This makes sense (and helps to avoid code bloat), but if
this is the concensus then I hope that qmail-scanner will soon address the
above 4 items internally, or that someone else will create a program
dedicated to this task. Exploit scanning may not belong in ClamAV,
but it needs to be addressed somewhere.
Hmm...when I just tested it (postfix, clamav, amavisd-new) tests 8, 12, 24, and 25 got through. Am I missing something in my config?
How worried should I be about those viruses getting through? :-/
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
