> >>Nigel Kukard schrieb:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Anyone seen this...
> >>>
> >>>3843 ?        S      0:00 clamd
> >>>3846 ?        S      0:01  \_ clamd
> >>>3847 ?        S      0:03      \_ clamd
> >>>
> >>>when i cat the /proc/3843/status file...
> >>>
> >>>Name:   clamd
> >>>State:  S (sleeping)
> >>>Tgid:   3843
> >>>Pid:    3843
> >>>PPid:   1
> >>>TracerPid:      0
> >>>Uid:    0       0       0       0
> >>>Gid:    0       0       0       0
> >>>FDSize: 32
> >>>Groups: 0
> >>>VmSize:   210900 kB
> >>>VmLck:         0 kB
> >>>VmRSS:     22940 kB
> >>>VmData:   209128 kB
> >>>VmStk:        16 kB
> >>>VmExe:        36 kB
> >>>VmLib:      1672 kB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Which version exactly (I guess it's 0.67 release, but better save...), 
> >>on which OS/Distribution ?
> >>I've not seen huge mem leaks in clam since it's 0.65 days, and I tend to 
> >>check this every now and then with "valgrind".
> >>
> >>Thomas
> >>
> >sorry, its 0.67. seems the VM kills it when it uses up all the RAM,
> >couldn't this be other peoples problems aswell? I mean i see quite a few
> >people saying clamd just dies?
> >
> Yes, but that's another issue which is supposed to be finally fixed in 
> CVS; a new release candidate should pop up soon.

So it has been fixed?

> 
> Again, which Distro/Version and kernel? Did you compile from source or 
> do you use some binary (from where)?
>

kernel 2.4.24, custom designed distro

compiled from source.

-Nigel
 

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to