On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:38:59AM -0800, Mitch (WebCob) wrote: > > Seeing how quickly this could get out of hand, and how hard it would be to > write code to "read" the password from the mail - how about a simple option > that allows full rejection of password encrypted archives - or optional > (based on db lookup) but I'm probably hoping too much there...
The question is how much of a problem it really is. Are users really that dumb? What I'm wondering is whether the encrypted version of the virus can be created by the unencrypted version, or whether the encrypted versions of the virus we have seen have all been produced by actual encrypted-zip infections. Anyone know? -- Erik Corry I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a [EMAIL PROTECTED] bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners. - B. Breathed. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
