On Wednesday 28 Jan 2004 12:03 am, Jure PeÄar wrote: > This would greatly reduce the work for mail administrators, with only > minimal changes to av engines and wrappers around them (like amavisd-new & > co).
Yes it's a good idea but it can't be trusted and we still need a solution here. I am working at finding a solution. The number of systems admins that still contact me telling me I have a virus on the back of a faked from address including my address and then when I point out the fake address problem get into an argument saying it's my site at fault not their's is worrying for the profession. If systems administrators can't even be trusted to set up systems correctly to not bounce on trapping a worm how can they be trusted to update to an AV system that supports some new flag? > What are clamav team and other users opinions about this? -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
