Mike Brodbelt wrote, Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:42 AM > Erik Bourget wrote: [...] > all I did was take 0.60-10 and untarred the 0.65 tarball > > over it. Any problems with this? It seems to work fine. > > I wonder if it would be worth the clamav site hosting debs for Woody. > Clamav isn't in woody at all, and the most recent backport I've found is > approaching 2 months old.
That'd be because the most recent package in sid is approaching two months old. There's a very good reason for that - the Debian maintainer has a policy of only backporting bugfixes, and not features, from non-released Clamav versions. (In fact, he doesn't have much of a choice - given Sarge's Release Manager's policy, such packages could have been uploaded, but they'd have to have gone into experimental, not sid). Adam ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
