Antony Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, from a non-technical person's point of view, it doesn't do ClamAV's > reputation much good if they see some other antivirus product identify a file > as "Sobig.F.dam" and ClamAV doesn't identify it at all. Such people are not > necessarily interested in the finer details of whether the thing is actually > dangerous or not - they just see that ClamAV didn't catch it (whatever it > is), whereas antivirus product X did, therefore product X must be better :)
On the contrary, if it is not dangerous and ClamAV does not detect it and product X does, then ClamAV is superior as Product X has just generated a false positive! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
