Yes, a dmg issue and an xar issue were mentioned. If the issue(s) remain, please open a bug at bugzilla.clamav.net or send some files or --debug output.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) <[email protected]>wrote: > Then I am sure the developers would be glad to help figure out the problem > and fix it. > > -- > Joel Esler > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 13:32, "Dale Walsh" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 0.98.1 DMG does not work. > > > > -- Dale > > > > > > > >> On Mar 21, 2014, at 09:16 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > >> > >> DMG support was just added in the last version of ClamAV. How long ago > did you do this testing? > >> > >> > >>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Dale Walsh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> You did miss it but it's a two headed nail. > >>> > >>> PDF, DMG, XAR and RAR have had issues not recognizing the test viruses > to name just a couple that spring to mind that we've had trouble with and > this all started happening when the clang and crap entered the picture. > >>> > >>> I've worked with the developers in the past, once the build > environment dependancies changed and I was told I had to upgrade my OS and > build tools is when it was no longer possible to resolve these issues as > the update solely for the purpose of building ClamAV is not an option and I > shouldn't be forced to use someone else's built tool preferences just > because they have the luxury of updating on a whim or purely for bragging > rights. > >>> > >>> It does not matter if my OS is dated, security patches are applied to > the build tools as they become available and this seems to satisfy all > other software that build from source except ClamAV. > >>> > >>> Having everything build with GCC 4.0 would allow me/us to re-deploy > ClamAV and contribute to the code base again (I have in the past) but the > chances of this are slim to non from what I recall because my OS and build > tools are dated and listening to rants about ancient and deprecated is > nothing more than someone spewing stupidity. > >>> > >>> The fact that I ensure all bugs and updates to the build tools are > fixed/added allows me to keep everything in harmony and there is no reason > to update anything to build a single software package when all other > software sources seem to be content with the existing build environment. > >>> > >>> If you wish to go off-list to continue the discussion I have no > objections. > >>> > >>> > >>> -- Dale > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 16:35 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Dale, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for your email. I'm not sure exactly what you are referring > to. Maybe I am missing a connection here or something, but the discussion > was around scanning DMG and XAR, which I think, if there's a issue with, > we'd be more than happy to work with anyone to try and square away. > >>>> > >>>> You seem to be discussing a build issue, and you say that it's a > waste of time. When did you get the impression that working with the > developers was a waste of time? If we're not communicating well enough, we > can fix that. But I think the team is doing a good job of that judging by > the amount of complaints I have received since we took over the project > from the old ClamAV team. > >>>> > >>>> Please let me know if we need to take this offline and discuss or > anything I can do to help. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Joel Esler > >>>> Open Source Manager > >>>> Threat Intelligence Team Lead > >>>> Vulnerability Research Team > >>>> > >>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Dale Walsh <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Mark, this has been an issue for many versions along with a slew of > others things not working as expected. > >>>> > >>>> As much as I liked ClamAV, we've abandoned it as a mail solution > shortly after things stopped working correctly and they changed the > required build tools so you can no longer build it with GCC 3.3/4.0/4.1/4.2 > and have a fully functional app. > >>>> > >>>> Yes there are flags to get it to build but certain modules and > features don't build and making an incomplete and partially functional > binary isn't appealing. > >>>> > >>>> Advice on updating build tools is a waste of time as there is no > reason to update the build tools just to build ClamAV as it's the only one > that has this ridiculous built-tool requirement and only an idiot would > tell me to update. > >>>> > >>>> My thoughts on this is simple, if it doesn't build with the basic GNU > GCC compiler tools then it's seriously flawed and needs these other tools > to overcome the short-comings of poorly written/implemented code. > >>>> > >>>> When I say build, I mean build with full functionality so don't go > off the deep-end stating it builds, partial functionality may be acceptable > to you bhut it isn't to me. > >>>> > >>>> At this time, for personal use, I use the source code but repackage > the build environment to work with what I have and I'm comfortable with > submitting corrections and patches, too much focus and complaints on my > build tools so why waste my time. > >>>> > >>>> -- Dale > >>>> > >>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Interesting... let me run some tests and get back to you. > >>>> > >>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Mark Allan <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Just out of interest, did you test to see if it *actually* worked? > >>>> > >>>> My configure output shows that dmg and xar are supported, but it > doesn't actually detect the Eicar test file within a disk image. > >>>> > >>>> configure: Summary of engine detection features > >>>> autoit_ea06 : yes > >>>> bzip2 : ok > >>>> zlib : /usr > >>>> unrar : yes > >>>> dmg and xar : yes, from /usr > >>>> > >>>> When I create a new disk image, copy the Eicar test file in, and scan > the dmg, it shows up as being clean. > >>>> > >>>> clamscan test.dmg > >>>> test.dmg: OK > >>>> > >>>> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- > >>>> Known viruses: 3259558 > >>>> Engine version: 0.98.1 > >>>> Scanned directories: 0 > >>>> Scanned files: 1 > >>>> Infected files: 0 > >>>> Data scanned: 10.07 MB > >>>> Data read: 10.02 MB (ratio 1.01:1) > >>>> Time: 4.845 sec (0 m 4 s) > >>>> > >>>> Does this work as expected for anyone else? > >>>> > >>>> Mark > >>>> > >>>> On 10 Feb 2014, at 23:38, Rafael Ferreira <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> That worked, thanks! > >>>> > >>>> On February 10, 2014 at 4:29:41 PM, Steven Morgan ( > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Rafael, > >>>> > >>>> Probably all you need to do install libxml&libxml2-dev, which is used > by > >>>> dmg and xar, then do your configure/make. > >>>> > >>>> Steve > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Rafael Ferreira <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Folks, > >>>> > >>>> I'm compiling clamav 0.98.1 on Linux (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) and I'm not > >>>> getting the new super awesome DMG and XAR file support: > >>>> > >>>> configure: Summary of detected features follows > >>>> OS : linux-gnu > >>>> pthreads : yes (-lpthread) > >>>> configure: Summary of miscellaneous features > >>>> check : no (auto) > >>>> fanotify : yes > >>>> fdpassing : 1 > >>>> IPv6 : yes > >>>> configure: Summary of optional tools > >>>> clamdtop : (auto) > >>>> milter : yes (disabled) > >>>> configure: Summary of engine performance features) > >>>> release mode: yes > >>>> jit : yes (auto) > >>>> mempool : yes > >>>> configure: Summary of engine detection features > >>>> autoit_ea06 : yes > >>>> bzip2 : ok > >>>> zlib : /usr > >>>> unrar : yes > >>>> dmg and xar : no > >>>> > >>>> Am I missing a configure flag or third party library? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>> > >>>> - Rafael > >>>> > >>>> ---- > >>>> scanii.com<http://scanii.com> - the web friendly malware scanner! > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > >> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > > Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > > _______________________________________________ > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html > Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net > _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
