On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:30:40 +0100 "Christophe Jaillet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> II/ Idea of implementation : > ========================== > 2.1) define a macro and macroize the code (AVOID_BM_SHIFT ???) everywhere > needed > > 2.2) add test like : if (BM_MIN_LENGTH == BM_BLOCK_SIZE) ... where needed > and let the compiler determine dead code and optimize it away > > 2.3) add a new inlined function (int cli_can_avoid_bm_shift() ???) that > perform this test > > 2.4) any other idea ? > > > Personally, I think that 2.3 is the best approach. Hi Christophe, 2.2 looks best to me. Sorry for the late answer. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Fri Feb 9 00:53:57 CET 2007 _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
