Damian Menscher wrote: >> I check for that negative length (arg#3) in a number of places, and >> I'm wondering if it's a stack corruption? > > Certainly seems like it: > > ~menscher> bc > obase=16 > -1210973824 > -482DFE80 > -1210973824+2^32 > B7D20180 > > Damian Menscher
Yeah. My problem is that it only ever seems to cause a problem in cl_scanfile(). And that combined with thorough checking for e.g. that negative length, makes me suspect cl_scanfile(). And because I'm running multi-threaded, I thought - is libclamav really thread-safe? /Per Jessen, Zürich _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
