On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 15:06 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > I don't see the need for it. Clamav-milter is stable. > > "One of those people actually has seen it restart the milter when it had > failed." > > No bug report was received that the milter is failing. It would be a better > use > of the author's time to track down alledged problems with existing software > than > write yet more software.
I actually agree with this sentiment, and it also applies to the various clamd monitoring scripts, which are also a bug hiding hack. -trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
