2005-02-17T15:01:43 Tomasz Kojm:
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html

Yup.

For new designs, the recommendation I've heard is to go with SHA-256
or greater. Apparently the -256, -384, and -512 aren't solely larger
hash sizes, they've also got the algorithm twiddled to try and
strengthen it somewhat against the current crop of attacks. They may
or may not hold up, but they seem to be the most strongly analyzed
competitors at the moment.

-Bennett

Attachment: pgpi6ukSZwBov.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-devel

Reply via email to