Thanks for the hint , actually this is what I have been thinking of but was wondering how can I get more details or samples about that as a matter of proof. ________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2023 9:49 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Routes
On 3/12/23 20:21, Mohammad Khalil via cisco-nsp wrote: > Greetings > I have two ASR9K connected to different providers (Uplinks). > I am receiving around 90K routes from each provider , as well , I have iBGP > between the ASR9K. > What am noticing is that ASR9K1 is advertising around 87K to ASR9K2 where > ASR9Ks is advertising around 7K routes. > Any hints? A case of active routes being announced to neighbors, where active routes = best routes/paths as seen from each router's point of view. ASR9K1 has more routes with better paths toward destinations via its upstream than ASR9K2 does. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
