Others mentioned EVPN for ELAN/VPLS type services, but it’s not just for 
multipoint services.  EVPN-VPWS is how we see most who do not have an existing 
Martini T-LDP deploying P2P L2VPN.  P2P is going to be transparent to most of 
what the customer or 3rd party provider  is sending.   If they have switches 
connected everywhere and end up in a loop, that’s something they need to be 
aware of and mitigate.

Thanks,
Phil

From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Shawn L via 
cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 11:46 AM
To: Cisco Network Service Providers <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] Best Practices for Transporting Layer-2 Services
I'm wondering what other providers are doing when they need to transport a
bunch of third-party layer-2 services?

For Example -- if another SP wants to hand you 3 vlans (for example
10,11,12) and have you transport them to a couple of sites.  Vlan 10 (could
be Q-in-Q or not) needs to go to sites A and B, vlan 11 (again could be
Q-in-Q) needs to go to sites C and D, etc.

I'm specifically asking (in a cisco world) what do you do to protect
yourself from any funny business (spanning tree, whatever) that may happen
on the other provider's network or on the end-customer's network.

Thanks

Shawn
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to