Okay my concern overall is not that it is in IOS 12. It's that it is in IOS XE and (possibly) other images.
Is there a list somewhere of what images support it? If not there probably should be. -----Original Message----- From: Hunter Fuller <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 3:49 PM To: Drew Weaver <[email protected]> Cc: Nick Hilliard <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [External] Re: [c-nsp] TIL: Maintenance Operations Protocol (MOP) Right. I rarely say this, because I know how much legacy cruft is out there, but: there is basically zero chance anyone on earth wants this capability. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1A +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 12:24 PM Drew Weaver <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, in my research I noticed that OS image age has nothing to do with it. > Newer images with different trains have it enabled, older images in totally > other trains as well. > > Also even though it appears to emulate VTY simply configuring the transports > doesn't disable it. > > I mostly mentioned it because when I did some Googling I noticed it is > referenced as being included in IOS XE. > > It should be forcibly removed entirely in my opinion. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 5:09 PM > To: Drew Weaver <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TIL: Maintenance Operations Protocol (MOP) > > Drew Weaver wrote on 04/08/2021 16:43: > > Sorry for the noise if you are all aware of what MOP is but if you > > aren't aware of what it is and use Cisco products (especially in a > > multi-tenant environment) it may be a good idea to read about it and > > evaluate any impact it may or may not have on your environment. > MOP is one of those services that seems to disappear and reappear on various > cisco software versions and trains, almost at random. It would be > interesting to know how much of the old DECnet stack is needed to keep this > particular fossil alive. > > It leaks link-local frames. This is harmful. We don't like it at IXPs. > > "no mop enabled" disables it on a per interface basis - this is possibly the > only cisco command that uses "enabled" instead of "enable" for this context, > i.e. this is very ancient. > > Nick > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_m > ailman_listinfo_cisco-2Dnsp&d=DwICaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A > _CdpgnVfiiMM&r=OPufM5oSy-PFpzfoijO_w76wskMALE1o4LtA3tMGmuw&m=r_nXzFBpL > rNkdnViCf2_TAzyoKVrjvgzTYs0C4qVXIE&s=bOyNBC5BLAZdP2j55JaFDQFBruZRO2OZS > 3UHflf_eiw&e= archive at > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__puck.nether.net_pi > permail_cisco-2Dnsp_&d=DwICaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnV > fiiMM&r=OPufM5oSy-PFpzfoijO_w76wskMALE1o4LtA3tMGmuw&m=r_nXzFBpLrNkdnVi > Cf2_TAzyoKVrjvgzTYs0C4qVXIE&s=iX2iEDTewXz03CuUxa1gbq8z7FCVRP0yxZyG_gOM > 0Ic&e= _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
