Can't using RFC1918 space for this purpose cause path MTU discovery to fail, too?
We use public addresses for that reason, as well as the others you listed. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:03 PM harbor235 <[email protected]> wrote: > > How are you IP'ng your connector networks between core and distribution? > Public space or private? I do not like the potential overlap with > management networks and I cannot DNS mike connector networks making my > traceroutes look pretty. > > I also like loopbacks publicly routable as well? Some organizations use > RFC1918 netwblocks for connector networks and loopbacks, is it just > preference or am I missing other reasons not to use 1918? > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
