On 6/17/20, 6:31 PM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
On 17/Jun/20 23:07, [email protected] wrote:
> First of all the "SR = network programmability" is BS, SR = MPLS, any
> programmability we've had for MPLS since ever works the same way for SR.
I see it the same way.
[pmb] There are things I can do with SR and a stack of globally significant
labels I can't do with LDP or RSVP-TE. I don't know if I'm going to call them
programmability though, that's a loaded marketing term.
Phil
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
