Hope this helps

I opened bug with Cisco where I had to shut and no shut the bridge domain, this 
is on a ASR920.  ASR1000's are also noted on the bug list.

Bug: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvj18480/?rfs=iqvred

Here is what I submitted.

When creating a new VPLS Network on a ASR920. I need to shut and no shut the 
bridge-domain. The VFI's to the remote 3 device remain in down state.

See the below config
Router#conf t
Router(config)#bridge-domain 650
Router(config-bdomain)#
Router(config-bdomain)#l2 vfi 11111 manual
Router(config-vfi)# vpn id 11111
Router(config-vfi)# bridge-domain 650
Router(config-vfi)# mtu 9180
Router(config-vfi)# neighbor 192.168.0.96 pw-class VPLS
Router(config-vfi-neighbor)# neighbor 192.168.0.82 pw-class VPLS
Router(config-vfi-neighbor)# neighbor 192.168.0.92 pw-class VPLS
Router(config-vfi-neighbor)#
Router(config-vfi-neighbor)#int Gi0/0/1
Router(config-if)#  service instance 1 ethernet
Router(config-if-srv)#  encapsulation default
Router(config-if-srv)#  bridge-domain 650
Router(config-if-srv)#
Router(config-if-srv)#exit
Router(config-if)#exit
Router(config)#exit
Router#sh mpls l2transport vc vcid 11111

Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID      Status
-------------  -------------------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
VFI 11111      vfi                        192.168.0.82  11111      DOWN
VFI 11111      vfi                        192.168.0.92  11111      DOWN
VFI 11111      vfi                        192.168.0.96  11111      DOWN

Router#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
Router(config)#bridge-domain 650
Router(config-bdomain)#shut
Router(config-bdomain)#no shut
Router(config-bdomain)#end
Router#sh mpls l2transport vc vcid 11111

Local intf     Local circuit              Dest address    VC ID      Status
-------------  -------------------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
VFI 11111      vfi                        192.168.0.82  11111      UP
VFI 11111      vfi                        192.168.0.92  11111      UP
VFI 11111      vfi                        192.168.0.96  11111      UP

Router#
________________________________
From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Tees 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 11:45 PM
To: Cisco-nsp List <[email protected]>
Subject: [c-nsp] ASR1000 local L2 bridge or local PW

Hey guys,

Has anyone got any form of local L2 working on ASR1000?

Still seems broken in latest code I have and needed it for a customer.
By broken I mean MAC's are learnt inside bridge domain but on either
ingress or egress tagging is something unexpected. I still need to
confirm PCAP.

I was using service instance on physical interface with a
bridge-domain to tie two ports together and some tag mangling/rewrite.
I have the same config working on ASR920 but one is ASIC and other
ASR1000 ESP so I expect some differences there.

Tried the local xconnect variants also.

Was planning on lodging TAC case soon.

Cheers,

Mark



interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0
 service instance 666 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 666
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 667
 !
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
 service instance 667 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 667
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 667
 !
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or 
previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information 
that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person 
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the 
information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY 
PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error please notify the 
sender immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the original 
transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank 
you.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to