On 10/02/2020 21:01, Keith Medcalf wrote: > How about you just say in English what it is you want to say instead > of wasting everyone's time?
"Click the fucking link and find out" ? (Protip: never ask a Brit to be explicit.) > Page does not exist, and I do not do tinyurl or bitly or any of that > sort of obfuscation crap. If you've decided to obfuscate HTTP 302 responses from your life, I'm not sure I can really help you navigate Cisco's security tools anyway. Suffice it to say, there are a heap of critical and/or high-level security vulnerabilities listed for the Cisco IOS version referenced by the OP (12.2(31)SGA1). Eschewing those recommendations in favour of dick-waving over high uptimes is an industry practice that we should really have killed-off by now. -- Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
