Hi! > Am 28.10.2019 um 09:40 schrieb Saku Ytti <[email protected]>: > That'll set you back about the same as new MX204, you need to be > really committed CSCO shop to go with ASR9001. I would not consider > that at all, even if it had to be Cisco.
Thanks for that recommendation. I’m not allergic to Juniper nor any other vendor, although it is traditional IOS that I know inside-out. But I do know my basics, so switching product is not an issue, really. When I look at Juniper I quickly find this: https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-series/datasheets/1000597.page And here - just like Cisco - they feature all sorts of fancy numbers that are all completely irrelevant to us. The smallest platform in that table features four times the peak bandwidth we *could* use with our 5x 1G/s connections, which we are currently utilizing at less than 500 M/s in total ... Yet the only numbers I am really interested in are: How many routes will each of these systems hold in the data plane? And how many full-feed BGP peers can it handle in the control plane? And these are not in this effing table! This is frustrating … Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe [email protected] http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
