> On 27 Jun 2019, at 17:53, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27/Jun/19 17:49, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > >> >> >> Putting my Cisco hat for a moment: >> >> There are currently no such plans, but the natural current replacement >> would >> be NCS 540 (IOS-XR box) and NCS 560 (XR box as well, more alike >> ASR 903/907 if you need modularity). > > I don't know why for a Metro-E application, IOS XR is simply too > heavy... maybe it's just me. > > I've not ran IOS XR in anything other than a CRS or ASR9000, so can't > say whether it's any quicker in an NCS*. But if not, I wouldn't want to > be the one speaking to the NOC about why 700 boxes in the Metro are down > for longer than what we had on an ASR920 (IOS XE) for a simple code > upgrade :-).
:D “Good old days of solid iron with QNX-running XR”. NCS 540 boots in ~90 seconds depending on the complexity of the configuration. I just did reboot one to check if I’m right. — ./ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
