Hi! > Am 21.06.2019 um 20:05 schrieb Gert Doering <[email protected]>: > What features do you need? "Switching" or "full L3 routing"? And > if routing, how large the table?
Switching. A new layer 2 „fabric“ for our data centre. I’m planning to go back to a router-on-a-stick design and separate routing and switching … If routing is available and stable, it would not hurt, of course. OSPF for v4 and v6, strictly IGP, definitely no uplink. Table size? Well, how many routes can you put into a v4 /20 …? ;-) Similar for v6, so „couple of dozen“ to „couple of hundred“. Less than 1000 routes definitely. > We've moved to Arista for the "1RU, lots of 10/25GE ports, MLAG" > places in our network, and we are very happy. Stuff works like a > breeze - and if it doesn't (we found a bug with IPv6 and OSPFv3, > of course) ATAC is really pleasant to work with. Turned out to be too expensive for us. 1 G/s more than enough as edge connectivity for servers, not that much „hyperconvergence“ going on, yet. That’s why it does not pay (yet) to have higher bandwidth at the ToR. So I’m looking for 2-3k for a ToR switch - upper limit. We are replacing refurbished Cisco gear that came at 600 per 48 1G ports with 2 10G uplinks. It’s really hard to find current manageable gear for our size ... Thanks, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe [email protected] http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
