Everyone,
I've run into a bit of a problem with policy routing IPv6 addresses where the
match pattern never matches (sample below).
We have 2 active/active links and have been using IPv4 policy routing for
years, we 're now starting to deploy IPv6 on the campus, and have hit an
immediate problem with running with active/active links.
Anybody else running IPv6 policy routing and have hit any issues?
Vlan interface has this assigned:
ipv6 policy route-map TEST-ROUTE-MAP-V6
sh route-map TEST-ROUTE-MAP-V6
route-map TEST-ROUTE-MAP-V6, permit, sequence 30
Match clauses:
ipv6 address prefix-list ABER-IPV6-SOUTH
Set clauses:
ipv6 next-hop YYYY:A::1
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map TEST-ROUTE-MAP-V6, permit, sequence 40
Match clauses:
ipv6 address prefix-list ABER-IPV6-NORTH
Set clauses:
ipv6 next-hop YYYY:800A::1
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
sh ipv6 prefix-list
ipv6 prefix-list ABER-IPV6-NORTH: 1 entries
seq 20 permit YYYY:8011::/64
ipv6 prefix-list ABER-IPV6-SOUTH: 1 entries
seq 30 permit YYYY:20::/64
Thanks,
Hefin
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
