Re: [c-nsp] Seamless MPLS interacting with flat LDP domains

Tue, 30 Apr 2019 05:58:39 -0700 


On 29/Apr/19 15:53, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> Even better to get rid of transport MPLS all together ... There is nothing
> in LDP MPLS which would be of any value as compared with basic IP UDP
> encap. Of course you can still run all of your L3VPNs or EVPNs if you wish
> so over IP transport.

Do you have a practical example of anyone doing this as a replacement
for MPLS-based encapsulation?

Mark.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/






















					Reply via email to