my question is the extra flash in the command: boot system *flash* bootflash:filename.bin
is that something new? Scott On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:53 AM Tyler Applebaum <[email protected]> wrote: > On the 4k series I use bootflash:<filename> > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Scott Voll > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:40 AM > To: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> > Subject: [c-nsp] Correct syntax for Boot system > > I have always used > > boot system flash:xxxxxx.bin or boot system bootflash:xxxx.bin > > did the syntax change to boot system flash flash0:xxxxx.bin??? > > I have a new 4331 that without the extra flash it failed to boot. Is this > new? did I miss the memo? > > does this carry over to ASRs and the older 29xx/39xx platforms? > > I'm booting a bunch of remote routers and don't want to be driving to > recover them from a simple mistake I missed. > > TIA > > Scott > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > Attention: Information contained in this message and or attachments is > intended only for the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential > and or privileged material that is protected under State or Federal law. If > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution > or action taken on it is prohibited. If you believe you have received this > email in error, please contact the sender with a copy to > [email protected], delete this email and destroy all copies. > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
