Christoffer Hansen <[email protected]> writes: Hi,
> I have recently run into a case with an ASR9k router running IOS-XR > v5.3.4. Were I by accident put an identical secondary subnet on a 2nd > interface located inside the same VRF as the first one. It is even a 2nd > sub-interface to another sub-interface on the same main interface. > > Case-in-point: The router accepted the configuration commit without > complaints and of course traffic then stops flowing. AFAIK, this is the standard behavior for IOS-XR. > Normally I would not expect this to be possible to do. And would expect > the router to output a warning telling me I am trying to commit an IPv4 > address|subnet already configured on another interface in the same VRF. A warning should have been logged by the router. Please check the logs for an entry containing: %IP-IP_ARM-3-CFLCT_FORCED_DOWN Regards, Nikolai -- Ich verwalte sie. Ich zähle sie und zähle sie wieder. Das ist nicht leicht. Aber ich bin ein ernsthafter Mann. \ ---> Antoine de Saint-Exupery, "Der kleine Prinz" _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
