Quick question as I am clueless on large SP networks (I'm a MSP guy not an ISP guy )- why not area 0.0.0.0 ?
-----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:08 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's This message originates from outside of your organisation. If you think your network is going to continue to grow , dual route reflector cluster is a huge must have in my mind, I love how you can add address families to one neighbor and let it bounce while the other neighbor stays up with all your routes still there I have ran a 100 node single area OSPF (area 0.0.0.1) MPLS/LDP network for several years, I believe simplicity and only as much complexity as is required for the job Aaron > On Jul 19, 2018, at 2:32 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have some practical design questions. > > 1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the > router (can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost > over trunk links with BFD enabled? > 2. Do you find less practical a MPLS network on a multi-area design vs a > single-area design? > 4. At what point would you introduce RouteReflectors in the network > (e.g. when 5, 10, 20 IBGP connections?) > > Can come up with some more in the meantime ;) > > Thanks! > Ton > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
