> based on what i???m reading ??? the asr1002hx is closer to an rp3-based > platform, again ??? comparing the numbers. i could be wrong on this. >
ASR 1002-HX has quad-core 2.5 Ghz, I'd say it is architecturally more closer to RP3. RP3 has quad-core 2.2Ghz. The slightly higher clock speed on 1002-HX is because the RP CPU also controls the built-in ESP control-plane. Check pages 72 and 67 on https://www.slideshare.net/Cisco/hawaii-tech-day-routing-platform-update-75001130 And I can't imagine that ASR1K RP2 will beat down ASR 9001 on BGP. Perhaps so on single full feed RP2 is probably much faster, but it is still IOS XE. I would imagine that on a peering/transit router scenario with multiple full feeds, ASR 9001 would scale much better. FWIW, I never had problems with ASR 9001 ever bogging down when sucking in 3-4 full tables. James _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
