Ahhh I see. Yepp, were using em as LSRs so no real public access vector into it so we didn’t deepdive and trim that much just added some standardized configuration on it. Good to know to be cautious with that setting though thanks 😊
//Gustav -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Saku Ytti [mailto:[email protected]] Skickat: den 4 februari 2017 01:38 Till: Gustav Ulander <[email protected]> Kopia: Adrian Minta <[email protected]>; [email protected] Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5501 & 5502 Experiences? On 4 February 2017 at 02:01, Gustav Ulander <[email protected]> wrote: Hey, > We are able to enter the configuration and were also able to show lpts and se > counters go up. It would be interesting to know how far you got? As far as unable to keep good BGP up, when unconfigured flood of BGP packets came in, Cisco confirmed not supported/implemented (yet). It's not atypical in this segment of devices, so not throwing dirt here. Many applications of the device are in networks where malicious packets are not a concern and it would be foolish to delay TTM until this is done. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
