Yes, the C variant of the PFC is necessary to have the VSS "bit" in the TCAM. Whether you need C or CXL is up to the rest of the stuff in your unit: if any XL, all must be XL.

On 1/16/17 7:03 AM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Hi all,


Am 16.01.2017 um 15:36 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen <[email protected]>:
In the release notes for IOS 15.1SY I found this remark about
supported Gigabit Ethernet modules:

WS-X6748-SFP
with WS-F6700-DFC3CXL , WS-F6700-DFC3C , WS-F6700-DFC3BXL (not supported in 
virtual switch mode)
Sorry, I have to rephrase my question after a second look:

----------------
WS-X6748-SFP
(with WS-F6700-DFC3CXL , WS-F6700-DFC3C ,
WS-F6700-DFC3BXL (not supported in virtual switch mode)
WS-F6700-DFC3B (not supported in virtual switch mode)
or WS-F6700-CFC )
----------------

So I think this reads as:

WS-X6748-SFP with DFC-3CXL or DFC3C     supported
with DFC3BXL or DFC3B                           supported, but no VSS

Am I reading this correctly? I yes, I have a different problem alltogether.

I upgraded two of our core switches from Sup720-3BXL to Sup720-10GE
with PFC-3CXL, then upgraded all the DFCs on the line cards and installed
IOS 15.1(2)SY9.

None of the copper Gigabit interfaces work. All show "down, line protocol is
down (notconnect)" regardless of the connection.

Any ideas on how to proceed from here?

BTW: this includes Gi1/1/3 and Gi2/1/3 - the copper interfaces in the supervisor
engines. Not only on the 6748 linecards.

Thanks
Patrick

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to