On 21 May 2016, at 20:42, CiscoNSP List wrote:
If this is true, could we potentially "limit" the number of Interfaces we enable FNF on?
No, this is still not a good idea. You could do egress with classic v9, but it wasn't a good idea then, either.
What's the objection to simply enabling ingress on the relevant interfaces?
----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
