I have never used Cisco’s ram for upgrades and never been bitten by this. The memory is usually the same memory. At one point I remember seeing a Kingston rebranded Cisco memory module for sale for several thousand dollars and the Kingston equivalent was 100 and change. Cisco memory is one of the biggest ripoffs.
On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:54 PM, Nikolay Shopik <[email protected]> wrote: > It's usually same memory from same vendor/supplier just different label. > > On 20.03.2015 20:51, Adam Greene wrote: >> Besides the risk of not being able to obtain support from Cisco (and maybe >> being billed by them) if a problem is traced to the third-party RAM >> (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/prod_warranty09186a00800b5594.html), >> does anyone see any issue with using non-Cisco RAM? Is it generally just as >> reliable as the Cisco stuff? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
