15.10.2014 14:02, Jared Mauch написав(ла): > As long as you can configure AToM xconnect you should be good. You may want > to encourage them to use Ethernet instead for the lower per bit cost of that > interface. > > Jared Mauch
Thnaks, Jared! Per bit cost is another storry in this case. :) > >> On Oct 15, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Artem Viklenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> Sorry for may be very stupid question. But googling does not >> helps so far. >> >> I've got a request from customer for SDH channel between >> two cities. At both locations we have cisco 7600's and >> MPLS network already deployed and works fine. >> >> At both sides we have SIP-400 and SPA-2XOC3-POS adapters. >> (Last time i use them 5 years ago and actually already >> forgotten many things about SONET/SDH.) >> >> In general, is it enougth to build xconnect beteween two POS interfaces >> to solve this task or we need another SPAs - SPA-1XOC3-CE for this? >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely yours, >> Artem Viklenko. >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- Sincerely yours, Artem Viklenko. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
