Speaking for my own experience, it wasn't a problem. From memory we had to change one RADIUS attribute we were using for shaping I believe (we were using an older attribute that caused a full VAI to be created, updating that fixed it). We don't do PBR however.
One thing I would suggest however - if you are using PBR for the purposes of doing redirects, ISG can do that instead. Likewise, if PBR is for segregating wholesale providers, you can either do L2TP forwarding or put each subscriber in a VRF (even VRF-lite) as an alternative. Neither are zero effort, but I'd suggest worth it in my experience I've steered clear of PBR due to the CPU hit it entailed on the 7200. On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:17 AM, James Bensley <[email protected]> wrote: > Reviving this thread; > > Lab'bing hasn't gone as well as I had expected. Testing with > ASR1002X's the lac of Policy Based Routing has been a blow and the > lack of full Virtual Access Interfaces is a pain. > > How is everyone managing without these features if you were once PBR > on your 72xx platforms for example, what happened/did you do? > > How painful is everyone finding the lack of full VAIs? > > Cheers, > James. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
