Sender: [email protected]
On-Behalf-Of: [email protected]
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR 1k for CGN/LSN
Message-Id: <caeufugn1q0takhno4n7w-d1vwe9ow2fu5z8crgjaflcy-i-...@mail.gmail.com>
Recipient: [email protected]
Recipient: [email protected]
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
I am building a small specific purpose ISP for about 1000 users. About 600
of the users need to be behind NAT444 (it is a student residential
environment).
Speeds of the users are NBN style (100/40, 50/20, 25/5, 12/1). User
profile is residential.
Upstream transit will be a few hundred megs.
I'm wondering if the 1001 or 1002 with a 2.5 ESP or 5 ESP will handle the
load of the CGN/LSN.
Also, is perhaps there any limiting issues of the 1002-F (I know,
discontinued).
Does anyone have a matrix which might show what load the 2.5 and 5 and
perhaps 10 ESPs could handle for different numbers of users. Also, perhaps
if the amount of RAM directly has an impact on the CGN/LSN capabilities and
performance.
Any personal experience on those platforms for low-end CGN/LSN would be
most welcome (off-list or on).
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
[email protected] ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
